Anyone who has ever
lived with and loved an animal must wonder Do Pets Go to
Heaven?
By Ptolemy Tompkins
At 24, on a whim, I became
the owner of a Netherlands dwarf bunny named Angus. He was about the size of a
baseball. In terms of personality, however, he soon established himself as a
giant. I moved around a lot in those days, and wherever I went, Angus went with
me. Whether I was waiting tables in Massachusetts or working as an office temp
in New York, Angus was always there when I got home, ready to cheer me up with
his odd little repertoire of habits. When he was feeling feisty, he’d charge
back and forth and thump his back feet on the floor. In a more relaxed frame of
mind, he’d stretch himself out like a cat. I’d sometimes wake up from a nap with
him perched alertly on my head. Then, the unthinkable. I came home to
find a cloth draped over his cage. A note from my roommate lay on top. “I’m
sorry,” it read. “When I got home, Angus was no longer alive.” I lifted the
cloth, and there was my little ball of personality, stock-still. In all the time
I’d had him, I’d never seen Angus asleep. Even at rest, he was partly on the
alert. Now, for the first time ever, I saw him with his eyes shut.
Angus’s death was something I should have been prepared for. Dwarf
bunnies don’t have a long life expectancy. All the same, I was inconsolable.
Just a rabbit? Forget about it. Angus’s passing hurt. I found myself thumbing
through my books on religion and mythology for references to animals and the
afterlife. This is silly, I thought. But silly or not, I wanted to know
what people over the centuries had to say on the matter. Plenty. Animals
played a large role in most ancient peoples’ visions of the spiritual world. The
mythologies of several ancient cultures claimed that when people passed on,
their dogs were waiting to guide them to the land of the blessed. The
Egyptians—cat people, as everyone knows—were especially emphatic in their belief
that cats and other animals played a key part in the afterlife. One Native
American legend states that when God set about to create the world, he brought
his dog along with him. What did the Bible have to say? On the surface
at least, the Bible seems to say very little about the place of animals in the
afterlife. Look up “dog” in a concordance, and you won’t find any evidence that
the people of biblical times valued the role dogs play in day-to-day life. When
the writer of Psalm 22, for example, says, “For dogs have compassed me,” he is
not describing a pleasant situation. It doesn’t get much better when one looks
to traditional Christian authors beyond the Bible either. Eminent churchmen like
St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas have left a number of very discouraging
passages about the place of pets, or any animals, in the world that waits beyond
the borders of earthly life. Though I didn’t know it then, this
experience of losing a pet and coming up short on biblical consolation is one
that many people have gone through. It’s also one that many have tried to
convince themselves they must simply accept. As Steve Wohlberg, author of the
recent book Will My Pet Go to Heaven?, told himself when he lost his dog:
“The central focus of the Bible is God, the people, and human salvation, not
dogs and cats, right?” Not so fast. Steve and a number of other writers
argue that the question “Will I see my pet again?” isn’t silly, and it isn’t a
question without an answer either. To discover as much, all one need do is take
a closer look at the Bible. Okay, the question of whether there are pets
in heaven is never answered straight-up in the Bible. But as M. Jean Holmes,
author of Do Dogs Go to Heaven?, writes, “The pieces have to be patiently
gathered, carefully laid side-by-side, then prayerfully interpreted.” The Bible
does indeed have an answer about whether we will see our furry loved ones again.
Consider the story in Genesis of the very first covenant established
between God and his people, made with Noah right after the flood. The clouds
part and the world’s first rainbow appears. God tells Noah that he is creating a
covenant “with you, and with your descendants after you; and with every living
creature that is with you, the birds, the cattle, and every beast of the earth
with you; of all that comes out of the ark, even every beast of the earth.” God
goes on to say that his covenant with “all flesh” shall never be “cut off”—a
strong suggestion that animals will not be excluded from his dealings with the
world. (This passage was an inspiration for “Rainbow Bridge,” an anonymous poem
that has become very popular on the internet. It describes how when people
arrive at the gates of heaven, the first thing they will encounter is their
deceased pets.) Then there’s Luke 3:6. “All flesh shall see the
salvation of God.” Or Mark 16:15—a passage well-loved by that great friend of
animals Saint Francis of Assisi. The risen Jesus tells the Apostles to go into
the world and “preach the Gospel to every creature.” Jesus filled his teachings
with references to animals. His promise in Matthew and Luke that not even a
sparrow falls to earth without God’s knowing it subtly but powerfully suggests
what every grieving pet owner feels: God refuses to forget a single one of his
creatures, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant. What about
the argument that runs: “Animals can’t go to heaven because the Bible says they
don’t have souls”? Norm Phelps points out in his book The Dominion of
Love that the Hebrew term repeatedly used to describe animals in the Old
Testament is nephesh chayah. Chayah means “living,” while
nephesh is the Hebrew term for the force that animates the body—what
Phelps describes as “the whatever-it-is that makes a person or an animal a
conscious, sentient individual.” A funny thing happened when this term
was translated into English. In most English versions of the Bible, different
words are used to translate nephesh chayah depending on whether animals
or people are being discussed. In Genesis 1:21 and 24, for example, Phelps
points out that nephesh chayah is translated as “living creature.” But in
Genesis 2:7, where the term refers to people, not animals, it’s translated as
“living soul.” The use of two different terms in the English translation
completely blurs the fact that in the original Hebrew, no such distinction
exists. Why did the bible’s English translators take such pains to
use different terms for the souls of animals and people, when the Hebrew of the
Old Testament repeatedly uses just one? Probably because they were concerned not
to contradict Genesis’ teaching that humans alone are created in God’s image.
But to acknowledge that animals have souls isn’t to usurp the unique place of
humans in God’s creation—as the original Hebrew makes clear enough. Of
all the biblical passages that I ultimately discovered I could turn to for
consolation, the most moving and compelling is the Old Testament’s single
greatest passage prefiguring the Christian heaven—Isaiah’s vision of the
Peaceable Kingdom: “The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the
leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the
fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.” Why, when Isaiah
wanted to paint the ultimate picture of heavenly fulfillment, did he choose to
make such rich use of animals? Because he knew what every pet owner knows: A
world without animals is a barren one. And clearly, a heaven without our pets
would be less heavenly. |